>>10814
The worst thing about this image is that it's just some grown ass coomer whining about sexualization being toned down, while also failing to escape from /pol/ echo chambers so they have to rope in "leftist/jew agenda" into it as well. Not that I would expect anything better from something a /v/tard would make
>Characters designed with San Francisco sensibilities
"female characters cannot have butch designs or be brown", dumb argument when there's plenty of standard white females out there in current media.
>Raceswaps of any kind
While I agree it's dumb, I don't think this is a minority exclusive trait. Whitewashing as a term exists for a reason, even if grossly overused by minorities
>Writing containing overtly anti-"White male" themes
Name 5 shows that do this besides Velma
>Any female character has their breasts reduced to any extent
Case of corporations heavily sanitizing media to best suit advertisers
>One way diversity
I agree, it's dumb.
>Any form of censorship or desexualization to dialog or costumes
Case of corporations heavily sanitizing media to best suit advertisers
>Dialog is "localized" to insert progressive politics or terminology.
Agreed, western localizers suck ass, this has been proven
>Marketing or community interaction involves lecturing, insulting, gaslighting, or guilting your potential customers
Nobody does this
>Female characters are intentionally made to look ugly
Case of adding realism to games in order to give the illusion of better graphics and aesthetic. While I dislike it, I highly doubt it's their intent to make them ugly.
>Grooming & LGBT Magnification
This is funny because it's completely unrelated to the argument of of the picture, as I highly doubt the same faggot who made this is watching Blue's Clues. Anyway, addressing the point, I wish people would just say they hate gays and trannies instead of trying to create narratives that they're grooming others. It's hypocritical otherwise as I'm sure these same people would not have a problem with tv shows imprinting Christian values onto kids. And before you accuse me of using "whataboutism", I don't think lessons of LGBT awareness and acceptance is grooming in the first place.
>Hypocritically desexualizes female characters while keeping male ones sexualized
Case of corporations heavily sanitizing media to best suit advertisers and also a case of "nobody cares about male sexualization because the target audience never sexualizes them"
>words words words words words words words words
If you don't think the males also don't look ugly then you're coping. And like my previous point, realism has been a tactic used to push the illusion of "better graphics" since the Xbox 360 days
>Emasculates male characters while female characters are portrayed as butch, flawless, and unbeatable
I feel like this is specifically a criticism towards the Mario movie, which is dumb because it undermines any sort of story that has a protagonist go through an underdog arc. It's not emasculation when said protagonist shit stomps the villain at the end. As for flawless female character critique, is it really any different than a damsel-in-distress female character? Both are bland and eye-rolling archetypes
>Unironically endorsed by anti-intellectual grifters who argue in bad faith
Small minority of people that only get spotlight from people (like you) outraging over them. Yawn
>Gender erasure
I agree it's dumb, no other comment
While some of these points are genuinely valid, they're made from the same reactionary mindset that believe trannies/minorities/feminists are ruining the planet so any real insight is never gained. A pity